On 19 October 2016 at 11:48, Gert Doering <gert@space.net> wrote:

Hi,

On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 11:39:10AM +0200, Lu Heng wrote:
> I believe it is an permenent solution to an temporary problem.
>
> Think 5 years from now, after last /8 ran out, will we still care about it
> anymore?
>
> Don't fix something that will no longer exsit in a short time period.

So I take this as "non-support" = "opposition"?

I think it is fairly clear here, but it would be good if people can very
explicitly state their position, as the to-be-expected large amount of
e-mail makes summarization very tedious for the chairs otherwise.

Community is consensus based, not vote based.

What I have said is one of the concern that have to be addressd with an reasonable counter argument.

Chair's job is not collecting vote but make sure all concerns have been addressed reasonablely.

But again, I think this is personal so I will not continue this discussion future.

Let's go back to the policy.

thanks,

Gert Doering
-- APWG chair

--
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?

SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279

--
Kind regards.
Lu