Should we put address policy wh together with IPv6 wg? Why we need two different wg for addressing?the day we start treat IPv6 as normal IP address is the day we really in a world of v6. This transmission is intended solely for the addressee(s) shown above. It may contain information that is privileged, confidential or otherwise protected from disclosure. Any review, dissemination or use of this transmission or its contents by persons other than the intended addressee(s) is strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, please notify this office immediately and e-mail the original at the sender's address above by replying to this message and including the text of the transmission received.
On 2014年11月9日, at 上午11:00, address-policy-wg-request@ripe.net wrote:
Send address-policy-wg mailing list submissions to address-policy-wg@ripe.net
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit https://www.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/address-policy-wg or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to address-policy-wg-request@ripe.net
You can reach the person managing the list at address-policy-wg-owner@ripe.net
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of address-policy-wg digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. FW: [policy-announce] 2014-12 New Policy Proposal (Allow IPv6 Transfers) (Erik Bais) 2. Re: 2014-12 New Policy Proposal (Allow IPv6 Transfers) (Andy Davidson) 3. Re: 2014-13 New Policy Proposal (Allow AS Number Transfers) (Andy Davidson)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1 Date: Sat, 8 Nov 2014 17:00:35 +0100 From: "Erik Bais" <ebais@a2b-internet.com> Subject: [address-policy-wg] FW: [policy-announce] 2014-12 New Policy Proposal (Allow IPv6 Transfers) To: <ipv6-wg@ripe.net> Cc: address-policy-wg@ripe.net Message-ID: <002601cffb6d$2647cb00$72d76100$@a2b-internet.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252"
Hi,
This email is to inform the people who are subscribed on the IPv6 WG list but not on the Address Policy WG list.
There is a policy proposal currently in discussion phase to Allow IPv6 Transfers.
You can find the full proposal at:
We encourage you to review this proposal and send your comments to <address-policy-wg@ripe.net> before 28 November 2014.
Regards, Erik Bais
-----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- Van: policy-announce-bounces@ripe.net [mailto:policy-announce-bounces@ripe.net] Namens Marco Schmidt Verzonden: donderdag 30 oktober 2014 13:43 Aan: policy-announce@ripe.net CC: address-policy-wg@ripe.net Onderwerp: [policy-announce] 2014-12 New Policy Proposal (Allow IPv6 Transfers)
Dear colleagues,
A proposed change to RIPE Document ripe-589, "IPv6 Address Allocation and Assignment Policy" is now available for discussion.
You can find the full proposal at:
https://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2014-12
We encourage you to review this proposal and send your comments to <address-policy-wg@ripe.net> before 28 November 2014.
Regards
Marco Schmidt Policy Development Officer RIPE NCC
------------------------------
Message: 2 Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2014 09:58:40 +0000 From: Andy Davidson <andy@nosignal.org> Subject: Re: [address-policy-wg] 2014-12 New Policy Proposal (Allow IPv6 Transfers) To: <address-policy-wg@ripe.net> Message-ID: <20141109095830.GA31177@chilli.default.andyd.uk0.bigv.io> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 01:43:29PM +0100, Marco Schmidt wrote: https://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2014-12 [... Allow IPv6 Transfer ...] We encourage you to review this proposal and send your comments to <address-policy-wg@ripe.net> before 28 November 2014.
Support.
-a
------------------------------
Message: 3 Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2014 10:05:49 +0000 From: Andy Davidson <andy@nosignal.org> Subject: Re: [address-policy-wg] 2014-13 New Policy Proposal (Allow AS Number Transfers) To: <address-policy-wg@ripe.net> Message-ID: <20141109100549.GB31177@chilli.default.andyd.uk0.bigv.io> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 03:56:48PM +0100, Marco Schmidt wrote: https://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2014-13 [... Allow AS Number Transfers ...] We encourage you to review this proposal and send your comments to <address-policy-wg@ripe.net> before 28 November 2014.
Support the end result but don't support text as it stands.
- Would prefer not to see it possible to transfer ASN on a temporary basis - if an organisation needs temporary resources these are available from the RIPE NCC.
- Not sure if a list of non-approved ASN transfers is useful, and concerned that it might put people off registering transfers with the NCC.
-a
End of address-policy-wg Digest, Vol 39, Issue 10 *************************************************