While I expressed support for this proposal at the last RIPE meeting, and still have some sympathy for the proposal, I think valid objectionsn were raised at the last meeting. .
As the free pool is gone - and there are no more 'unused addresses' to preserve - there is still a need for responsibe use of the IPv4 pool. Conserving the public resource of v4 is important to make the Internet work while migrating to v6.
It was unfortunate that this discussion was cut short at the last meeting - as the original meeting plan allowed ample time for discussing this.
So I do belive further duiscussion and carefull reflection of the consequences of this proposal at the next meeting is needed.
Moving forward and concluding over summer holidays on such an important matter is not appealing to me.
Hans Petter
On Tuesday, July 16, 2013, Daniel Stolpe wrote:
On Mon, 15 Jul 2013, Donal Cunningham wrote:
Dear colleagues,
The second version of the draft document for the policy proposal
2013-03 has been published, along with an impact analysis
carried out by the RIPE NCC.
Support.
D.
+1.
Daniel Stolpe
_________________________________________________________________________________
Daniel Stolpe Tel: 08 - 688 11 81 stolpe@resilans.se
Resilans AB Fax: 08 - 55 00 21 63 http://www.resilans.se/
Box 13 054 556741-1193
103 02 Stockholm
--