Hi, El 23/04/2015 a las 13:43, Gert Doering escribió:
... and the community is free to declare that "Make another LIR and move resources to old LIR (right away)" is considered abuse of the last /8 policy, and dis-incentivize it...
Sure we are. But I always have seen a problem with this kind of proposals and the community. The problem is that lot of members of the community are IP Trader/Broker/Sellers so, a policy such this one are VERY GOOD for them while is VERY BAD for the new lirs that only hold a /22. The community should be objetive, and Im pretty sure it isnt. Why Elvis, a well know IP Broker from V4Escrow, proposed this instead of "Unused space should be returned to RIPE"??? Did the community think about if all the offers in the Listing Service are reclaimed from RIPE, the IPv4 Exhaustion "dissapear"? Why nobody in the community proposed it? Regards, -- Daniel Baeza Centro de Observación de Red Dpto. Red y Sistemas Television Costa Blanca S.L. Telf. 966.190.847 | Fax. 965.074.390 http://www.tvt.es | http://www.tvt-datos.es Correo: d.baeza@tvt-datos.es -- [Atención] La información contenida en este e-mail es confidencial, privilegiada y está dirigida exclusivamente a su destinatario. Cualquier revisión, difusión, distribución o copiado de este mensaje sin autorización del propietario está prohibido. Si ha recibido este e-mail por error por favor bórrelo y envíe un mensaje al remitente. [Disclaimer] The information contained in this e-mail is privileged and confidential and is intended only for its addressee. Any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail is prohibited. If you have received it in error please delete the original message and e-mail us. (!) El medio ambiente es responsabilidad de todos. Imprime este mail si es absolutamente necesario.