On 28.08.2015 15:13, Nick Hilliard wrote:
Anyone is free to suggest a better mechanism. If you have some ideas which are better that what's already there, please feel free to write a proposal.
Maybe something along the lines of "you can have a second /22" after a certain period of time if you only have a /22. The rationale behind this could be that RIPE NCC got more address space than anticipated when the last /8 was made. According to https://www.ripe.net/publications/ipv6-info-centre/about-ipv6/ipv4-exhaustio... RIPE NCC currently have 17.7 M IPv4 addresses left - which is slightly more than a /8 (https://www.ripe.net/publications/ipv6-info-centre/about-ipv6/ipv4-exhaustio...) NRO June figures: https://docs.google.com/viewer?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.nro.net%2Fwp-content%2F... Afrinic: 2.7 RIPE NCC: 1.08 APNIC: 0,69 Lacnic: 0.16 Arin: 0.1 now down to 0.0015 So if somebody want to pursue this I suggest looking a t https://www.ripe.net/publications/docs/ripe-642 and create a proposal using the Policy template in Appendix B But it is really time to get serious about IPv6. (Since you can do Google and Facebook on v6 - what more do you want:-) -- Hans Petter Holen Mobile +47 45 06 60 54 | hph@oslo.net<mailto:hph@oslo.net> | http://hph.oslo.net