27 Oct
2010
27 Oct
'10
2:55 a.m.
On 21/10/2010 14:38, kpn-ip-office@kpn.com wrote:
I'm in favour of this policy
Maybe we should change the sentence
"Cumulatively, no more than 248 additional IPv4 addresses may be assigned to any particular End User for the purposes outlined in section 6.10."
Into something like
"Cumulatively, an PI assignment will not reach beyond the next /24 boundary from the motivated need. This might thus result in an PI assignment of more than one subnet of which each subnet is a minimum of a /24".
(p.e. a /23, /24 when a need of ~ 520 IP-addresses is motivated).
I agree that the wording needs a little work to make the intent clearer, but I'm not convinced that this particular suggestion is necessarily better. Nick