Hi,

Il 20/06/2016 10:04, Gert Doering ha scritto:

      
I would consider this also as a fringe case - legitimate according to the
letter of the policy, but not according to the spirit.   These /22s are
not for trading.
There is space allocated for trading?

But I'm close to giving up on this and calling a ban on further changes
to the IPv4 policy 
I would support it.
- the "new LIR" folks here are accting in a fairly
irresponsible way regarding *future* participants, while at the same
time complaining that they are treated unfairly by the old LIRs - totally
ignoring the fact that *without the foresight of these old LIRs* you
wouldn't have any space at all today.
To punish the bad behavior of one this 2016-03 policy would have many bad side effect as
I already thanked old LIRs didn't request their /22 if you part of those I am perfectly aware I have to be thankful
about this filantropy.

This is not the way to do bottom-up policy making - "I want my cookie and
I want it now, and I do not care for the greater good".
bottom up is to listen arguments from everyone in the community and find a reasonable agreement that satisfies all parties

Gert Doering
        -- APWG chair
regards
Riccardo
--
Ing. Riccardo Gori
e-mail: rgori@wirem.net
WIREM Fiber Revolution
Net-IT s.r.l.
Via Cesare Montanari, 2
47521 Cesena (FC)
Tel +39 0547 1955485
Fax +39 0547 1950285

--------------------------------------------------------------------
	CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
This message and its attachments are addressed solely to the persons 
above and may contain confidential information. If you have received 
the message in error, be informed that any use of the content hereof 
is prohibited. Please return it immediately to the sender and delete 
the message. Should you have any questions, please contact us by re-
plying to info@wirem.net
        Thank you
WIREM - Net-IT s.r.l.Via Cesare Montanari, 2 - 47521 Cesena (FC)
--------------------------------------------------------------------