Another option (but that isn't something for this list I guess) is to have some LIR extra light account with just 1 IPv6 range and for more you need to become a normal LIR, an extra
From: address-policy-wg-admin@ripe.net [mailto:address-policy-wg-admin@ripe.net] On Behalf Of Sander Steffann limitation
could be that it would be required that you've some IPv4 PI space.
This might be a valid option, but indeed not as something for this list but as something for the RIPE NCC GM.
I do get the impression here that the current policy (Get a /32 or larger PA for providing access service to customers, or get a /48 PI as a multi homed end-user) is not 'wrong', but that people have problems with the cost of running an LIR. If this is the case I am not sure if we should start changing the policy...
Hello Sander, However as this isn't an option for this list (and I don't know if this idea is something that people could agree on at the RIPE NCC GM) I think this list should look for other options to "solve" this practical problem. That could be changing a policy to make it easier to get IPv6 PI if you already own IPv4 PI. I'm happy to write down a proposal for the changes. However I'll vote against it when it isn't accepted and the RIPE NCC GM did decide before that moment to create some option for this problem that is cheaper (but possible very limited, like only 1 IPv6 /48 range and for more you need a LIR account like they currently exist). Regards, Mark