Re: [address-policy-wg] 2014-01 New Policy Proposal (Abandoning the Minimum Allocation Size for IPv4)

On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 07:58:44PM +0100, Janos Zsako wrote:

I think there is a misunderstanding here. This policy (2014-01) does not change the rest of the text of 5.1. It still says: 1. The size of the allocation made will be exactly one /22.

You're right, it does. My bad. That actually removes the main reason to be unhappy with the proposal; the reverse DNS issue is not strong enough to sustain an objection on. Thanks for clarifying this, Sascha Luck