Jim Reid wrote: [...]
Sergey, these are Noble Things that hopefully everyone can agree on.
I would be very reluctant to do so, after reading: "that will allow millions of people from Russia and Europe to speed up DNS-requests and filter out untrustful websites like with malware and phishing content... Besides, we hope to provide services for parents preventing children from accessing forbidden websites. This alone will benefit millions of internet users too." That rather sounds like a single point of failure or a "red button". In principle, my personal opinion here is OT, too, but I'd like to make the case that it shouldn't be the NCC's business to assess the "value" or "benefit" or "merit" of a particular (planned) service or application. The NCC should never get into the nasty business of vanity numbers, imho! If a need for resources is properly documented, then the applicant gets the next free junk of available resources; according to the NCC's internal and technically and administratively sound procedures. Full stop. Wilfried.