Michael.Dillon@radianz.com (Michael.Dillon@radianz.com) wrote:
This makes more sense than giving a /32 to everyone who feels that their service is "critical". If you analyse the situation by the 80/20 rule, then Google represents the 20% of "critical" services that are big enough to be their own ISP. My suggestion is meant to support the 80% of "critical" services that could benefit from the same technology as Google, but which are not large enough to go it alone.
Yet, we do not have a solution (in the RIPE area) for your 20%. Elmar. -- "Begehe nur nicht den Fehler, Meinung durch Sachverstand zu substituieren." (PLemken, <bu6o7e$e6v0p$2@ID-31.news.uni-berlin.de>) --------------------------------------------------------------[ ELMI-RIPE ]---