On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 11:17 AM, Elvis Velea <elvis@velea.eu> wrote:
Hi Roger,
On 10/1/13 9:43 AM, Roger Jørgensen wrote:
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 9:27 PM, Sascha Luck <lists-ripe@c4inet.net> wrote:
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 05:22:52PM +0200, Elvis Velea wrote:
There are only two paths, from the RIPE NCC to LIR and from the RIPE NCC to End user (we may decide to change the name) via the Sponsoring LIR.
I would be in favour of converting all resources into "independent resources" and the path going, in all cases:
RIR -> Sponsoring LIR -> End User.
[...]
You're talking about a quite radical changes to how we think of IP space.
Correct, current proposal is quite a radical change. However, it does not change much the reality today.
Companies do request /48 PI assignments saying that they will use it only for their infrastructure and then start giving bits of it to customers without actually registering the assignment/sub-allocation and basically violating the policy.
What you're hinting at are not that difficult from something we're discussing on IETF level, and in the concept of LISP. Get a new block of address space that will be distributed directly to end-users. It's just IP space.
LISP is a totally different story. Let's not mix them up, please :-)
Think you missed that my reply was to Sasha's mail, not the propasal as a whole:) -- Roger Jorgensen | ROJO9-RIPE rogerj@gmail.com | - IPv6 is The Key! http://www.jorgensen.no | roger@jorgensen.no