Potential Improvements to the Temporary Internet Number Assignment Policies
Dear colleagues of the Address Policy Working Group, During the last RIPE Meeting in May, I presented on several observations that the Registration Services department had [1]. After receiving some feedback during the meeting, it was agreed to continue the discussion on the mailing list before RIPE 85. One of the topics discussed was the challenges encountered when dealing with temporary assignment requests. A specific policy allows the RIPE NCC to assign Internet Number resources on a temporary basis for a specific time-limited purpose, such as academic research and experimental purposes, conferences and other types of events. [2] Over the past years, the RIPE NCC has received some requests for academic research that required only a few IPv4 addresses for actual experiments, but within a routable prefix. This created a conflict with the current policy which requires the use of at least 50% of the requested IPv4 address space. With some creativity, the RIPE NCC has been able to approve these requests so far, but this has resulted in unnecessary delays in processing these requests. It is also possible that people have been refraining from submitting a request because of this policy limitation. One possible solution would be to review the current policy and propose a policy change, for example the introduction of a minimum IPv4 assignment size. Does the working group agree that this is an issue that should be discussed and that might require a policy change? Kind regards, Marco Schmidt Manager Registration Services RIPE NCC [1] https://ripe84.ripe.net/archives/video/786/ [2] https://www.ripe.net/publications/docs/ripe-587
On Tue, 11 Oct 2022, 20:50 Marco Schmidt, <mschmidt@ripe.net> wrote:
One possible solution would be to review the current policy and propose a policy change, for example the introduction of a minimum IPv4 assignment size.
Does the working group agree that this is an issue that should be discussed and that might require a policy change?
I value research being done immensely as a downstream consumer of its findings. This stuff helps us decide how to manage addresses in the wide. Noting that I work in an RIR (APNIC) I would welcome a conversation seeking to improve access to routable prefixes by researchers, so we can see good research on BGP, security, routing and network behaviour. I was aware of difficulties for at least one research group in almost all RIR over last year. I think this topic merits discussing. Cheers George
Marco Schmidt wrote on 11/10/2022 11:49:
One possible solution would be to review the current policy and propose a policy change, for example the introduction of a minimum IPv4 assignment size.
Does the working group agree that this is an issue that should be discussed and that might require a policy change?
seems reasonable. Nick
Hi,
On 12 Oct 2022, at 12:36, Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org> wrote:
Marco Schmidt wrote on 11/10/2022 11:49:
One possible solution would be to review the current policy and propose a policy change, for example the introduction of a minimum IPv4 assignment size. Does the working group agree that this is an issue that should be discussed and that might require a policy change?
seems reasonable.
+1 Sander
Hi, I am in favor for this suggestion as well.
Marco Schmidt wrote on 11/10/2022 11:49:
One possible solution would be to review the current policy and propose a policy change, for example the introduction of a minimum IPv4 assignment size. Does the working group agree that this is an issue that should be discussed and that might require a policy change? seems reasonable. +1 Sander
+1 Kurt
participants (5)
-
George Michaelson
-
Kurt Kayser
-
Marco Schmidt
-
Nick Hilliard
-
Sander Steffann