Re: [address-policy-wg] RIPE Access Policy Change Request to allow allocations to critical infrastructure
12 Jan
2004
12 Jan
'04
4:48 p.m.
chapuis@ip-plus.net (Andre Chapuis) wrote:
Agreed, And what about defining an address-range where every ISP opens its filter up to /29 (as an example) ? This would deal with both anycast and address-space conservation. Let's show that we (as ISPs) are not bound to the /24 forever !
Nice idea. You try convincing the Tier-1s (and -wannabes). I second this thought, but I deem it impractical, since the "big players" will be hard to convince to change their filtering boundaries. I believe, some answers will be in the style of "who's RIPE anyway?". Yours, Elmar. -- Es gibt Luegen, verdammte Luegen und RIPE-141(-219)-Netzantraege. (mlelstv, dcii 2003) -----------------------------------------------------------[ ELMI-RIPE ]---
7653
Age (days ago)
7653
Last active (days ago)
0 comments
1 participants
participants (1)
-
Elmar K. Bins