Re: [address-policy-wg] address-policy-wg Digest, Vol 63, Issue 6
+1 for the proposal Am 24.11.2016 22:29 schrieb <address-policy-wg-request@ripe.net>:
Send address-policy-wg mailing list submissions to address-policy-wg@ripe.net
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/address-policy-wg or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to address-policy-wg-request@ripe.net
You can reach the person managing the list at address-policy-wg-owner@ripe.net
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of address-policy-wg digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re: 2016-05 New Policy Proposal (Synchronising the Initial and Subsequent IPv6 Allocation Policies) (Silvia Hagen) 2. Re: 2016-05 New Policy Proposal (Synchronising the Initial and Subsequent IPv6 Allocation Policies) (JORDI PALET MARTINEZ) 3. Re: 2016-05 New Policy Proposal (Synchronising the Initial and Subsequent IPv6 Allocation Policies) (Carsten Br?ckner)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1 Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2016 20:59:00 +0000 From: Silvia Hagen <silvia.hagen@sunny.ch> To: Marco Schmidt <mschmidt@ripe.net>, "address-policy-wg@ripe.net" <address-policy-wg@ripe.net> Subject: Re: [address-policy-wg] 2016-05 New Policy Proposal (Synchronising the Initial and Subsequent IPv6 Allocation Policies) Message-ID: <F1D4404E5E6C614EB9D3083F4D15A7E70ABF899B@hex02> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Dear WG
I support this policy. It seems natural to me that for allocation of subsequent space the same rules apply like for the initial allocation. It also helps organizations, that have received their space before the updated initial allocation policy can receive space based on the same criteria.
Silvia Hagen
Chair Swiss IPv6 Council
-----Urspr?ngliche Nachricht----- Von: address-policy-wg [mailto:address-policy-wg-bounces@ripe.net] Im Auftrag von Marco Schmidt Gesendet: Donnerstag, 24. November 2016 14:20 An: address-policy-wg@ripe.net Betreff: [address-policy-wg] 2016-05 New Policy Proposal (Synchronising the Initial and Subsequent IPv6 Allocation Policies)
Dear colleagues,
A new RIPE Policy proposal 2016-05, "Synchronising the Initial and Subsequent IPv6 Allocation Policies"
is now available for discussion.
The goal of this proposal is to match the subsequent IPv6 allocation requirements with the initial allocation requirements.
You can find the full proposal at:
https://www.ripe.net/participate/policies/proposals/2016-05
We encourage you to review this proposal and send your comments to < address-policy-wg@ripe.net<mailto:address-policy-wg@ripe.net>> before 23 December 2016.
Regards,
Marco Schmidt
Policy Development Officer
RIPE NCC
Sent via RIPE Forum -- https://www.ripe.net/participate/mail/forum
Constanze, all - I'd be much grateful if folks here (and on any other list they are subscribed to, too) would actually follow the following recommendation: On 25.11.2016 11:04, constanze buerger wrote:
[...]
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of address-policy-wg digest..."
- which is part of any and all digests they are getting. Thank you very much - kind regards, Carsten
participants (2)
-
Carsten Schiefner
-
constanze buerger