Michael and all, Why not? There are efforts in IPv8 and in china, IPv9. -----Original Message-----

From: michael.dillon@bt.com Sent: Jun 11, 2007 4:47 AM To: address-policy-wg@ripe.net Subject: RE: [address-policy-wg] 2007-05 Discussion Period extended until 9 July 2007 (IPv6 ULA-Central)

...

PDP Number: 2007-05 IPv6 ULA-Central

Dear Colleagues

The Discussion Period for the proposal described in 2007-05 has been extended until 9 July 2007.

It disturbs me to see that RIPE is seriously engaged in discussing the implementation of an addressing proposal that the IETF has already rejected. Anyone who supports this proposal AT THIS TIME, is also attacking the current structure of the Regional Internet Registry system and its relationship to IANA, the IETF and ICANN.

This is not the time or the place to be discussing central ULA addresses. If the IETF has rejected the idea in the past, then it is up to people to fix their design and take it back to the IETF forums. Regional Internet Registries should not create policy for numbering resources which have not been created by the IETF or delegated to the RIRs by IANA.

--Michael Dillon

Regards, Jeffrey A. Williams Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 134k members/stakeholders strong!) "Obedience of the law is the greatest freedom" - Abraham Lincoln "Credit should go with the performance of duty and not with what is very often the accident of glory" - Theodore Roosevelt "If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B; liability depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by P: i.e., whether B is less than PL." United States v. Carroll Towing (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947] =============================================================== Updated 1/26/04 CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security IDNS. div. of Information Network Eng. INEG. INC. ABA member in good standing member ID 01257402 E-Mail jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com Registered Email addr with the USPS Contact Number: 214-244-4827