Re: [address-policy-wg] 2011-05 New Policy Proposal (Safeguarding future IXPs with IPv4 space)
I support this proposal. One question: Is it the same /16 in 5.6.2 as in 5.6.3? Or does that mean that two /16 will be held back? regards. danrl -- Dan Luedtke http://www.danrl.de
Hi there, On 25 Oct 2011, at 15:57, Dan Luedtke <maildanrl@googlemail.com> wrote:
I support this proposal.
One question: Is it the same /16 in 5.6.2 as in 5.6.3? Or does that mean that two /16 will be held back?
Hi Thanks for your support. An additional /16 is proposed. Andy
Hi, I support this policy. Babak On Oct 25, 2011, at 10:13 PM, Andy Davidson wrote:
Hi there,
On 25 Oct 2011, at 15:57, Dan Luedtke <maildanrl@googlemail.com> wrote:
I support this proposal.
One question: Is it the same /16 in 5.6.2 as in 5.6.3? Or does that mean that two /16 will be held back?
Hi
Thanks for your support.
An additional /16 is proposed.
Andy
participants (3)
-
Andy Davidson -
Babak Farrokhi -
Dan Luedtke