Reducing IXP IPv4 assignment default size to a /26
Dear community, The problem with ipv4 network speculation for IXP is exaggerated. RIPE NCC forbids transferring this networks to another company. Have there been cases of transmission of such networks? Kind regards, Viacheslav Adamanov. IXP Mesh Ukraine, Mariupol
Hello, Yes, there is some. As an example, what append if you move your activity from sole proprietorship to company and sponsor an ixp ? Another example, small ixp backed by multiple isp. After sometime, one want to stop and move ressource to other one. Blocking PI for IXP transfert is a nonsense for me. Just ripe need to be sure they are still and only used for ixp usage. Also, pruposing a /26 maybe kill some abuse by design. I saw some IXP pi on fullview and they are not a "configuration mistake" from one member. Sarah Le 05-09-23 à 15:43, Viacheslav Adamanov a écrit :
Dear community,
The problem with ipv4 network speculation for IXP is exaggerated. RIPE NCC forbids transferring this networks to another company.
Have there been cases of transmission of such networks?
Kind regards, Viacheslav Adamanov.
IXP Mesh Ukraine, Mariupol
On Tue, Sep 5, 2023, at 15:43, Viacheslav Adamanov wrote:
The problem with ipv4 network speculation for IXP is exaggerated. RIPE NCC forbids transferring this networks to another company.
Have there been cases of transmission of such networks?
Late to the show, but yes, there are such cases ("transmission" of an IXP, blocks included). -- Radu-Adrian FEURDEAN
participants (3)
-
Radu-Adrian FEURDEAN -
Servperso -
Viacheslav Adamanov