Re: [address-policy-wg] Now that final /8 policy may be in action ...
It’s a shame, a company with fraudulent methods receive 1 million IP address for next three months but my company after giving all requested statics will receive /22 subnet instead of at least /14 subnet!!! On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 6:49 PM, Martin Millnert <millnert@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Hamed,
Yes, it's a lottery!
Sorry that you didn't win.
I didn't either, tried to get a PI out. :) But didn't get it.
Best, Martin
On Fri, 2012-09-14 at 18:47 +0430, Hamed Shafaghi wrote:
It’s a shame, a company with fraudulent methods receive 1 million IP address for next three months but my company after giving all requested statics will receive /22 subnet instead of at least /14 subnet!!!
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 6:37 PM, Martin Millnert <millnert@gmail.com> wrote: On Fri, 2012-09-14 at 15:56 +0200, Tore Anderson wrote: > The delegated-ripencc-extended-latest shows which blocks were free at the start of the day, then it's just a matter of some whois queries to figure out the rest. > > Right now it seems 128.0.107.0-128.0.111.255 are still free, plus those five /24s out of 192/8 I listed earlier. And maybe those /25+es (didn't check as I'm on the road at the moment). So it's pretty much all gone now. > > Tore
Right, as per the announcements [1][2] as well, we're officially in final /8 land now, and IPRAs ran the "available pool" down to the ground.
So, somewhere between 35-60M EUR locked up for the RIPE NCC now, from one-shot-LIRs, with current policy. Does the RIPE NCC need all this money or will that complicate things, especially w.r.t IPv4 as an asset issues? Or does it matter what we do?
IPv4 just became an asset in this land regardless. :-)
Best, Martin
[1]
http://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/ncc-announce/2012-September/000615.ht...
[2]
https://www.ripe.net/internet-coordination/news/ripe-ncc-begins-to-allocate-...
-- I Hamed Shafaghi I I Managing Director I
I Skydsl® Telecom I hamed@skydsl.ir I www.skydsl.ir I
-- I Hamed Shafaghi I I Managing Director I I Skydsl® Telecom I hamed@skydsl.ir I www.skydsl.ir I
On 9/14/12 4:20 PM, Hamed Shafaghi wrote:
It’s a shame, a company with fraudulent methods receive 1 million IP address for next three months but my company after giving all requested statics will receive /22 subnet instead of at least /14 subnet!!!
probably a simple matter of where you were in the queue. nothing to do with any conspiracy theory :) jan
It’s a shame, a company with fraudulent methods receive 1 million IP address for next three months but my company after giving all requested statics will receive /22 subnet instead of at least /14 subnet!!!
probably a simple matter of where you were in the queue. nothing to do with any conspiracy theory :)
And with a queue of over 200 requests I think most people in that queue have been disappointed... Sander
participants (3)
-
Hamed Shafaghi -
Jan Zorz ＠ go6.si -
Sander Steffann