On 21 October 2011 12:44, Emilio Madaio <emadaio@ripe.net> wrote:

   www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2011-04

We encourage you to review this proposal and send your comments to <address-policy-wg@ripe.net> before 18 November 2011.

Hi On the premises that there are no protocol specific comments in the policy then I support this proposal too. This should be a matter of address assignment policy only. Based on a mixture of /56 and /48 assignments to users it's easily possible for a medium to large ISP to need more than a /32. Also, increasing allocation sizes can only do good things for the IPv6 DFZ. -- Daniel Holme