Dear members, During previous RIPE NCC Regional Meeting, I noticed that ( according to our instructor ) there are some organizations having AS number while they do not have a multihome network. According policy it is a mandatory requirement for having an ASN. Even in AS request form there is a mandatory field ( peers ) which requestor has to declare at least 2 peers, otherwise the request will not be processed by hostmaster. and here: http://www.ripe.net/lir-services/resource-management/allocations-and-assignm... it is clearly mentioned that “Current guidelines require a network to be multi-homed, and have a unique routing policy for an ASN to be assigned” Now if it is really true that there are single-home organizations with ASN, isn’t it a wrong doing? Kind Regards, Saeed.
Dear Saeed, Thanks for this, But is there any to control this? In country like Iran in which you can only peer with your upstream. What they can do? Thanks On Sat, Nov 22, 2014 at 12:49 PM, Saeed Khademi <saeed@ipm.ir> wrote:
Dear members,
During previous RIPE NCC Regional Meeting, I noticed that ( according to our instructor ) there are some organizations having AS number while they do not have a multihome network.
According policy it is a mandatory requirement for having an ASN. Even in AS request form there is a mandatory field ( peers ) which requestor has to declare at least 2 peers, otherwise the request will not be processed by hostmaster. and here:
http://www.ripe.net/lir-services/resource-management/allocations-and-assignm... it is clearly mentioned that "Current guidelines require a network to be multi-homed, and have a unique routing policy for an ASN to be assigned"
Now if it is really true that there are single-home organizations with ASN, isn't it a wrong doing?
Kind Regards, Saeed.
-- Regards, Shahab Vahabzadeh, Network Engineer and System Administrator Cell Phone: +1 (415) 871 0742 PGP Key Fingerprint = 1C43 988E 01A8 4D95 B662 9118 CD94 9F10 4DF4 6163
Hi To add a comment, the upstream you mentioned here, has at least 2 different ASN’s. In addition, Multihome doesn’t necessarily mean peering with the sole upstream but you can peer with others… Cheers, Reza From: address-policy-wg-bounces@ripe.net [mailto:address-policy-wg-bounces@ripe.net] On Behalf Of Shahab Vahabzadeh Sent: Saturday, November 22, 2014 1:22 PM To: Saeed Khademi Cc: address-policy-wg@ripe.net Subject: Re: [address-policy-wg] Just FYI Dear Saeed, Thanks for this, But is there any to control this? In country like Iran in which you can only peer with your upstream. What they can do? Thanks On Sat, Nov 22, 2014 at 12:49 PM, Saeed Khademi <saeed@ipm.ir<mailto:saeed@ipm.ir>> wrote: Dear members, During previous RIPE NCC Regional Meeting, I noticed that ( according to our instructor ) there are some organizations having AS number while they do not have a multihome network. According policy it is a mandatory requirement for having an ASN. Even in AS request form there is a mandatory field ( peers ) which requestor has to declare at least 2 peers, otherwise the request will not be processed by hostmaster. and here: http://www.ripe.net/lir-services/resource-management/allocations-and-assignm... it is clearly mentioned that “Current guidelines require a network to be multi-homed, and have a unique routing policy for an ASN to be assigned” Now if it is really true that there are single-home organizations with ASN, isn’t it a wrong doing? Kind Regards, Saeed. -- Regards, Shahab Vahabzadeh, Network Engineer and System Administrator Cell Phone: +1 (415) 871 0742 PGP Key Fingerprint = 1C43 988E 01A8 4D95 B662 9118 CD94 9F10 4DF4 6163 -- This email was Virus checked by Juniper Security Gateway.
Hi there, Yes I know, But they only peer with the ASN which you bought service from. You mean ISPs must buy two kind of service from provider (this upstream) to be multi-home or convince the peer with both of ASNs? Thanks On Sat, Nov 22, 2014 at 1:34 PM, Reza Mahmoudi <R.mahmoudi@mobinnet.net> wrote:
Hi
To add a comment, the upstream you mentioned here, has at least 2 different ASN's. In addition, Multihome doesn't necessarily mean peering with the sole upstream but you can peer with others...
Cheers,
Reza
*From:* address-policy-wg-bounces@ripe.net [mailto: address-policy-wg-bounces@ripe.net] *On Behalf Of *Shahab Vahabzadeh *Sent:* Saturday, November 22, 2014 1:22 PM *To:* Saeed Khademi *Cc:* address-policy-wg@ripe.net *Subject:* Re: [address-policy-wg] Just FYI
Dear Saeed,
Thanks for this, But is there any to control this? In country like Iran in which you can only peer with your upstream.
What they can do?
Thanks
On Sat, Nov 22, 2014 at 12:49 PM, Saeed Khademi <saeed@ipm.ir> wrote:
Dear members,
During previous RIPE NCC Regional Meeting, I noticed that ( according to our instructor ) there are some organizations
having AS number while they do not have a multihome network.
According policy it is a mandatory requirement for having an ASN. Even in AS request form there is a mandatory field ( peers )
which requestor has to declare at least 2 peers, otherwise the request will not be processed by hostmaster.
and here:
http://www.ripe.net/lir-services/resource-management/allocations-and-assignm...
it is clearly mentioned that "Current guidelines require a network to be multi-homed, and have a unique routing policy for an ASN to be assigned"
Now if it is really true that there are single-home organizations with ASN, isn't it a wrong doing?
Kind Regards,
Saeed.
--
Regards, Shahab Vahabzadeh, Network Engineer and System Administrator
Cell Phone: +1 (415) 871 0742 PGP Key Fingerprint = 1C43 988E 01A8 4D95 B662 9118 CD94 9F10 4DF4 6163
--
This email was Virus checked by Juniper Security Gateway.
-- Regards, Shahab Vahabzadeh, Network Engineer and System Administrator Cell Phone: +1 (415) 871 0742 PGP Key Fingerprint = 1C43 988E 01A8 4D95 B662 9118 CD94 9F10 4DF4 6163
Hi, On Sat, Nov 22, 2014 at 12:49:22PM +0330, Saeed Khademi wrote:
Now if it is really true that there are single-home organizations with ASN, isn???t it a wrong doing?
"You can only see a single upstream" doesn't mean the AS does not have a unique routing policy - it could have a local peering with some other local ISP, which you just won't see in the global table. Gert Doering -- NetMaster -- have you enabled IPv6 on something today...? SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
participants (4)
-
Gert Doering
-
Reza Mahmoudi
-
Saeed Khademi
-
Shahab Vahabzadeh