What we want to be acceptable in IPv4 PI and IPv6 PI?
Hi all, Trying to look into my presentation today from a higher-level perspective ... What is the expected usage of IPv4 and IPv6 PI? It should be the same or different? Do we want to use IPv6 PI as an entry point for people, without any restrictions, to start providing services and then they can grow up to become an LIR? That means that an IPv6 PI can be used to provide hosting/housing services? What about broadband services to end-users? Peter, maybe you have a different perspective about how to approach this. Can you share it in the list? Regards, Jordi ********************************************** IPv4 is over Are you ready for the new Internet ? http://www.consulintel.es The IPv6 Company This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about this communication and delete it.
Hi, On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 12:08:49PM +0200, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via address-policy-wg wrote:
Trying to look into my presentation today from a higher-level perspective ...
What is the expected usage of IPv4 and IPv6 PI?
We should stop caring about IPv4 PI, as that is long gone. So the focus needs to be "what is an IPv6 PI policy that is useful for the RIPE region". Wether or not this is the same as what we had for IPv4 in the past is only of historic relevance. Gert Doering -- APWG chair -- have you enabled IPv6 on something today...? SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard, Michael Emmer Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
So the focus needs to be "what is an IPv6 PI policy that is useful for the RIPE region".
Wether or not this is the same as what we had for IPv4 in the past is only of historic relevance.
after all, as humans have proven time and time again, we have nothing to learn from history :) randy
Hi, On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 04:24:15PM +0200, Randy Bush wrote:
So the focus needs to be "what is an IPv6 PI policy that is useful for the RIPE region".
Wether or not this is the same as what we had for IPv4 in the past is only of historic relevance.
after all, as humans have proven time and time again, we have nothing to learn from history :)
This is not what I said and not what I meant. I just see the attempt to keep IPv6 PI policy in sync with something that does no longer exist as a waste of our collective time. Looking at possible ways IPv4 PI was and is used and using that as additional data to make good IPv6 PI policy is, of course, useful :-) Gert Doering -- have you enabled IPv6 on something today...? SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard, Michael Emmer Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
We should stop caring about IPv4 PI, as that is long gone.
And about IPv4 PA and stop to help RIPE to earn money. :) ср, 17 окт. 2018 г., 16:12 Gert Doering <gert@space.net>:
Hi,
Trying to look into my presentation today from a higher-level
On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 12:08:49PM +0200, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via address-policy-wg wrote: perspective ...
What is the expected usage of IPv4 and IPv6 PI?
We should stop caring about IPv4 PI, as that is long gone.
So the focus needs to be "what is an IPv6 PI policy that is useful for the RIPE region".
Wether or not this is the same as what we had for IPv4 in the past is only of historic relevance.
Gert Doering -- APWG chair -- have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?
SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard, Michael Emmer Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
participants (4)
-
Aleksey Bulgakov
-
Gert Doering
-
JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
-
Randy Bush