Re: [address-policy-wg] 2006-01 New Draft Document Published (Provider Independent (PI) IPv6 Assignments for End User Organisations)
All, I strongly support Marco's position on this. Let's get this policy done asap and deal with changes in a later document. Kind regards, Remco ----- Original Message ----- From: address-policy-wg-admin@ripe.net <address-policy-wg-admin@ripe.net> To: Gert Doering <gert@space.net> Cc: address-policy-wg@ripe.net <address-policy-wg@ripe.net> Sent: Tue Feb 10 13:18:35 2009 Subject: Re: [address-policy-wg] 2006-01 New Draft Document Published (Provider Independent (PI) IPv6 Assignments for End User Organisations) On 10 feb 2009, at 13:47, Gert Doering wrote:
What you ("you" as in "the community") now need to make up your mind about is:
- do you want to accept 2006-01 as it is right now, in version 5.0, and make amendments for the "LIR to itself" special case later on (to go forward, I hear people are really waiting for it).
- do you want to adapt 2006-01, which means "at least one extra round of discussion/review phase".
Let me voice support for 'move on as is' and discuss any changes to it in a new proposal. This whole PI thing has been on hold for too long. Groet, MarcoH This email is from Equinix Europe Limited or one of its associated/subsidiary companies. This email, and any files transmitted with it, contains information which is confidential, may be legally privileged and is solely for the use of the intended recipient. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this email immediately. Equinix Europe Limited. Registered Office: Quadrant House, Floor 6, 17 Thomas More Street, Thomas More Square, London E1W 1YW. Registered in England and Wales No. 6293383.
Hi guys, .... i just add myself here at a random point of the thread and do a full quote intentionally to support my point that this new discussion is once again ridiculous (like full quotes :) ) at this point of the PDP, so, once again: I support this, DO implement it, do it NOW. Change the details later if nescessary. (how many times have i said that now for this proposal?) Remco van Mook schrieb:
All,
I strongly support Marco's position on this. Let's get this policy done asap and deal with changes in a later document.
Kind regards,
Remco
----- Original Message ----- From: address-policy-wg-admin@ripe.net <address-policy-wg-admin@ripe.net> To: Gert Doering <gert@space.net> Cc: address-policy-wg@ripe.net <address-policy-wg@ripe.net> Sent: Tue Feb 10 13:18:35 2009 Subject: Re: [address-policy-wg] 2006-01 New Draft Document Published (Provider Independent (PI) IPv6 Assignments for End User Organisations)
On 10 feb 2009, at 13:47, Gert Doering wrote:
What you ("you" as in "the community") now need to make up your mind about is:
- do you want to accept 2006-01 as it is right now, in version 5.0, and make amendments for the "LIR to itself" special case later on (to go forward, I hear people are really waiting for it).
- do you want to adapt 2006-01, which means "at least one extra round of discussion/review phase".
Let me voice support for 'move on as is' and discuss any changes to it in a new proposal. This whole PI thing has been on hold for too long.
Groet,
MarcoH
This email is from Equinix Europe Limited or one of its associated/subsidiary companies. This email, and any files transmitted with it, contains information which is confidential, may be legally privileged and is solely for the use of the intended recipient. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this email immediately. Equinix Europe Limited. Registered Office: Quadrant House, Floor 6, 17 Thomas More Street, Thomas More Square, London E1W 1YW. Registered in England and Wales No. 6293383.
-- ======================================================================== = Sascha Lenz SLZ-RIPE slz@baycix.de = = Network Design & Operations = = BayCIX GmbH, Landshut * PGP public Key on demand * = ========================================================================
participants (2)
-
Remco van Mook -
Sascha Lenz