2015-04 Discussion Period extended until 25 September 2015 (RIPE Resource Transfer Policies)
Dear colleagues, The Discussion Period for the proposal 2015-04, "RIPE Resource Transfer Policies" has been extended until 25 September 2015. The goal of this proposal is to create a single document with all relevant information regarding the transfer of Internet number resources. The proposer asked to provide additional feedback or questions. You can find the full proposal at: https://www.ripe.net/participate/policies/proposals/2015-04 We encourage you to review this policy proposal and send your comments to <address-policy-wg@ripe.net>. Regards, Marco Schmidt Policy Development Officer RIPE NCC
Dear AP WG, On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 02:15:26PM +0200, Marco Schmidt wrote:
The Discussion Period for the proposal 2015-04, "RIPE Resource Transfer Policies" has been extended until 25 September 2015.
The discussion phase is now over. There was quite a bit of feedback, much of it asking for clarification, but as far as I could see, some support and no strong opposition - which is good enough for the discussion phase. I do want to see the impact analysis on this, and discuss the potential changes this proposal brings slightly more educated (read: based on the NCC's understanding of the changes) :-) Thus I've asked Marco to prepare the impact analysis, and then we move 2015-04 to the review phase and also discuss at the upcoming RIPE meeting. Gert Doering -- APWG chair -- have you enabled IPv6 on something today...? SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
Hi, On Thu, Oct 08, 2015 at 02:37:54PM +0200, Gert Doering wrote:
There was quite a bit of feedback, much of it asking for clarification, but as far as I could see, some support and no strong opposition - which is good enough for the discussion phase.
I do want to see the impact analysis on this, and discuss the potential changes this proposal brings slightly more educated (read: based on the NCC's understanding of the changes) :-)
Uh, for clarification: I *did* see some opposition, but no "strong opposition to the proposal in general". The opposition was to some of the policy changes this brings, and I think it's valuable to discuss this with the Impact Analysis already done. Gert Doering -- NetMaster -- have you enabled IPv6 on something today...? SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
On Thu, Oct 08, 2015 at 02:44:48PM +0200, Gert Doering wrote:
Uh, for clarification: I *did* see some opposition, but no "strong opposition to the proposal in general". The opposition was to some of the policy changes this brings, and I think it's valuable to discuss this with the Impact Analysis already done.
Some of this opposition was from me. I fully agree that we need the Impact Analysis to properly judge the impact of the proposal and was waiting for it, too. rgds, Sascha Luck
participants (3)
-
Gert Doering -
Marco Schmidt -
Sascha Luck [ml]