Policy proposal 2011-02 has been accepted
Dear working group, After we (the chairs of this working group) have declared consensus on policy proposal 2011-02 the policy development process has been evaluated by the collective of all the RIPE working group chairs. After a very thorough analysis (this has not been an easy process!) they reached the conclusion that the declaration of consensus is valid. We now ask the RIPE NCC to implement policy proposal 2011-02. As promised we also give ourselves the task to keep a very close eye on the effects of this policy change. We will report on these effects at least at every RIPE meeting. Thank you, The APWG Chairs
Hi, It was brought to my attention that I only mentioned the proposal number and not the title of the proposal...
We now ask the RIPE NCC to implement policy proposal 2011-02. As promised we also give ourselves the task to keep a very close eye on the effects of this policy change. We will report on these effects at least at every RIPE meeting.
For those who have erased all memories of 2011-02 and what it is about: 2011-02: Removal of multihomed requirement for IPv6 PI http://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2011-02 :-) Sander
For those who have erased all memories of 2011-02 and what it is about: Finally, after one year :)
Now we have to have an eye on it. What is the best way to keep track of changes caused by this policy? Does the RIPE NCC keep special records for this? When will there be first statistic data? Thanks to everyone who participated in the policy-discussion, although I hope the 'told-you-so'-party will not win ;) regards, danrl -- Dan Luedtke http://www.danrl.de
What is the best way to keep track of changes caused by this policy? To clarify: For someone who does not have access to a DFZ-router or a full table.
I remember some nice graphs from Gert/SpaceNet came up during the discussion. regards, danrl -- Dan Luedtke http://www.danrl.de
Hi, On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 09:25:04AM +0100, Dan Luedtke wrote:
What is the best way to keep track of changes caused by this policy? To clarify: For someone who does not have access to a DFZ-router or a full table.
I remember some nice graphs from Gert/SpaceNet came up during the discussion. regards,
I expect the NCC to keep track on their assignments (they already do), and we'll ask them to regularily report at the APWG sessions. My statistics are at http://www.space.net/~gert/weekly/ - and they are now autogenerated every day, so you always have the most recent numbers there. Sometimes the text labels in the graphs are a positioned a bit weird, if the X axis changes and I don't adjust the rest properly in time... but that's what you get by adapting scrips that have been written for "run twice a year, check the output, adapt until everything looks nice!" to "run daily, only look at the results every few weeks" :-) But the data "how much PA, how much PI, coming from which region" is in there, and that's the one that will show if 2011-02 should lead to a major disturbance of the force... Gert Doering -- APWG chair and IPv6 number geek -- have you enabled IPv6 on something today...? SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) Tel: +49 (89) 32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
participants (3)
-
Dan Luedtke -
Gert Doering -
Sander Steffann