2010-07 New Draft Document Published (Ambiguity cleanup on IPv6 Address Space Policy for IXP)
Dear Colleagues, The draft document for the proposal described in 2010-07 has been published. The impact analysis that was conducted for this proposal has also been published. You can find the full proposal at: http://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2010-07.html and the draft document at: http://www.ripe.net/ripe/draft-documents/ripe-451-draft2010-07.html We encourage you to read the draft document text and send any comments to address-policy-wg@ripe.net before 13 January 2011. Regards Emilio Madaio Policy Development Officer RIPE NCC
On 16 December 2010 16:08, Emilio Madaio <emadaio@ripe.net> wrote:
We encourage you to read the draft document text and send any comments to address-policy-wg@ripe.net before 13 January 2011.
I thought the consensus was to use 'published' rather than 'clear' J -- James Blessing 07989 039 476
Hi James,
On 16 December 2010 16:08, Emilio Madaio <emadaio@ripe.net> wrote:
We encourage you to read the draft document text and send any comments to address-policy-wg@ripe.net before 13 January 2011.
I thought the consensus was to use 'published' rather than 'clear'
I think you are correct. 'Published' is also much easier to verify for the IPRA's than 'clear'. Unfortunately the webcasts are not available online yet, but IIRC there was agreement to use 'published'. Does anybody remember differently? Thanks, Sander
I think you are correct. 'Published' is also much easier to verify for the IPRA's than 'clear'. Unfortunately the webcasts are not available online yet, but IIRC there was agreement to use 'published'. Does anybody remember differently?
We were in danger of wordsmithing with a few hundred people in the room, but it tended towards "published" at the end. http://ripe61.ripe.net/archives/steno/2/ A search for "Blessing" takes you towards the conclusion of the discussion... :) Rob
participants (4)
-
Emilio Madaio -
James Blessing -
Rob Evans -
Sander Steffann