All, Thank you for all replies to my question:) We support proposal 2006-01 as is and Andy's proposal to go forward. With kind regards, Andries Hettema IP-Office KPN Internet 070 45 13398 ip-office@kpn.com -----Original Message----- On 10 Feb 2009, at 12:47, Gert Doering wrote:

But I can see your point - there might be cases where, for whatever reason, a LIR might want to assign a separate network to itself, and indeed this is not currently covered by 2006-01. [...] - do you want to accept 2006-01 as it is right now, in version 5.0, and make amendments for the "LIR to itself" special case later on (to go forward, I hear people are really waiting for it).

There are significant advantages to passing "as is" with the aim of getting the policy passed quickly, because I do believe there are networks who are not LIRs waiting for v6 PI to be allowed in Europe. If others agree with my premise that an organisation's status with the NCC should not be a barrier to v6 PI, I will propose the policy to fix. Thanks Andy ________________________________________________________________________ ______________ This inbound message to KPN has been checked for all known viruses by KPN MailScan, powered by MessageLabs. For further information visit: http://www.kpn.com, keyword 'Mailscan' ________________________________________________________________________ ______________