Dear Address Policy WG, The Review Phase for proposal 2024-02 (IPv6 Initial Allocations /28) has ended. Comments included: - discussion on the impact of using the term "Member" instead or "LIR" - a suggestion to break the proposal into two separate parts to accommodate the new terminology - a disagreement that there is a need to extend from /29 to /28 - a description of a use case for the /28 The proposers have been working on an updated version of the proposal designed to address feedback. This update will get a new Discussion Phase. The RIPE NCC will publish the updated proposal soon. We'd like to thank the proposers and everyone who participated in the discussion so far. Alex, Franziska, and Leo Your co-chairs