Re: [address-policy-wg] 2010-06 New Draft and Impact Analysis Document Published (Revert 'Run Out Fairly')
Hello all, I agree that the three months limitation has to go.. However, I also believe that the period for allocations and assignments should be equal Best regards On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 4:28 PM, Emilio Madaio <emadaio@ripe.net> wrote:
Dear Colleagues,
The draft document for the version 2.0 of the policy proposal 2010-06,"Revert 'Run Out Fairly'" has been published. The impact analysis that was conducted for this proposal has also been published.
The changes in the version 2.0 are in the Title, Summary and Rationale. They are purely editorial and reflect that the depletion is no longer a future event.
You can find the full proposal at:
https://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2012-06
and the draft document at:
https://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2012-06/draft
We encourage you to read the draft document text and send any comments to address-policy-wg@ripe.net before 27 November 2012.
Regards
Emilio Madaio Policy Development Officer RIPE NCC
I support this proposal. I see no need to discuss assignment vs allocation periods since the depletion prevents further allocations. I see this proposal as a way to bring back sense in the assignments that the LIRs are able to make from the address space they currently hold. Rgds Nina Bargisen TDC dk.teledanmark On 31.10.2012 15:50:21 +0200, George Giannousopoulos wrote:
Hello all,
I agree that the three months limitation has to go.. However, I also believe that the period for allocations and assignments should be equal
Best regards
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 4:28 PM, Emilio Madaio <emadaio@ripe.net> wrote:
Dear Colleagues,
The draft document for the version 2.0 of the policy proposal 2010-06,"Revert 'Run Out Fairly'" has been published. The impact analysis that was conducted for this proposal has also been published.
The changes in the version 2.0 are in the Title, Summary and Rationale. They are purely editorial and reflect that the depletion is no longer a future event.
You can find the full proposal at:
https://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2012-06
and the draft document at:
https://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2012-06/draft
We encourage you to read the draft document text and send any comments to address-policy-wg@ripe.net before 27 November 2012.
Regards
Emilio Madaio Policy Development Officer RIPE NCC
Hi George, * George Giannousopoulos
I agree that the three months limitation has to go.. However, I also believe that the period for allocations and assignments should be equal
The period for allocation is only relevant for transfers nowadays, as the NCC does not issue needs-based allocations any longer. With that in mind, I'd like to point out that there is another active proposal - 2012-03 - that seeks to increase the transfer allocation period to 24 months, which is the same as the NCC's interpretation (according to the Impact Analysis) of what the new assignment period would be, if this proposal (2012-06) passes. http://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2012-03 In other words, it would seem that you can get both the things you want, by supporting both 2012-06 and 2012-03. Best regards, -- Tore Anderson Redpill Linpro AS - http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
participants (3)
-
George Giannousopoulos -
Nina Hjorth Bargisen -
Tore Anderson