Re: [address-policy-wg] Summary of actions from RIPE 47 address policy meeting
Hans and all, Are members in the AFNIC region do not support a the proposed minimum allocation of a /22. Hans Petter Holen wrote:
Action Responsible Status 46.1 Chairs-WG Revise RIPE 152 (not allowed to charge for domain names), Done
46.4 Chairs Summarize and propose updated description of the policy process Completed
47.1 Chair Policy Development Process Form a task force to write a policy development process propposal
47.2 NCC RIPE 152 to Historical and recomed to the RIPE NCC to make a clear statement that they do not charge for IP addresses
47.3 Andreas Bäß Anycast for CCTLD complete discussion on mailinglist to form formal proposal
47.4 Chair Afrinic proposal for /22 mimimum allocation size. Seek final consensus on the list
Best Regards, Hans Petter Holen Chair
Regards, -- Jeffrey A. Williams Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 134k members/stakeholders strong!) "Be precise in the use of words and expect precision from others" - Pierre Abelard "If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B; liability depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by P: i.e., whether B is less than PL." United States v. Carroll Towing (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947] =============================================================== Updated 1/26/04 CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security IDNS. div. of Information Network Eng. INEG. INC. E-Mail jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com Contact Number: 214-244-4827
participants (1)
-
Jeff Williams