2008-05 New Policy Proposal (Anycasting Tier 0/1 ENUM)
PDP Number: 2008-05 Anycasting Tier 0/1 ENUM Dear Colleagues A new RIPE Policy Proposal has been made and is now available for discussion. You can find the full proposal at: http://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2008-05.html We encourage you to review this proposal and send your comments to <address-policy-wg@ripe.net> before 2 October 2008. Regards Filiz Yilmaz RIPE NCC Policy Development Officer
Hi, On Thu, Sep 04, 2008 at 01:37:36PM +0200, Filiz Yilmaz wrote:
You can find the full proposal at:
I want to point out a technicality that came up in an offline discussion about this proposal. The actual *text* to be changed is in conflict with the text introduced (but not yet policy) of 2007-01. The idea behind the proposal is *not* in conflict with 2007-01. So a bit of "sequential processing" is needed - the specific wording for this proposal will need to be adapted if 2007-01 becomes policy in the meantime. But first of all, let's hear your thoughts about the idea behind this. Gert Doering -- APWG chair -- Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations: 128645 SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) Tel: +49 (89) 32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
Greetings! I support this proposal. I definitely want (g|cc)TLD operators to have an opportunity to increase resilience by setting up multiple anycasting clouds. And I think that the actual anycast address space spent for this will not even approach the "worst case" prediction - equivalent of slightly over /15 additional space. If I am wrong and it would get wide spread to fill up the /15, it is worth for that in my opinion. Best regards, Tomas Filiz Yilmaz wrote:
PDP Number: 2008-05 Anycasting Tier 0/1 ENUM <cut>
-- Tomáš Hlaváček <tomas.hlavacek@elfove.cz>
participants (3)
-
Filiz Yilmaz -
Gert Doering -
Tomas Hlavacek