RE: [address-policy-wg] RE: Private address space in IPv4 and IPv6 [was something irrelevantly titled]
IPv4 exists most of it's time without RIR at all. So it's not prove anything. Other consideration is only philosophy, not policy.
-----Original Message----- From: address-policy-wg-admin@ripe.net [mailto:address-policy-wg- admin@ripe.net] On Behalf Of michael.dillon@bt.com Sent: Friday, May 29, 2009 2:29 PM To: address-policy-wg@ripe.net Subject: RE: [address-policy-wg] RE: Private address space in IPv4 and IPv6 [was something irrelevantly titled]
...
IPv4 runout proves that the historical ways are the right ways.
--Michael Dillon
poty@iiat.ru wrote:
IPv4 exists most of it's time without RIR at all. So it's not prove anything.
May I suggest that you read up on reality, in particular the period of substantial growth and wide-spread penetration?
Other consideration is only philosophy, not policy.
Interesting... My feeling is that we should go back to real-life issues. Wilfried.
Amen ! On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 1:50 PM, Wilfried Woeber, UniVie/ACOnet < Woeber@cc.univie.ac.at> wrote:
poty@iiat.ru wrote:
IPv4 exists most of it's time without RIR at all. So it's not prove anything.
May I suggest that you read up on reality, in particular the period of substantial growth and wide-spread penetration?
Other consideration is only philosophy, not policy.
Interesting... My feeling is that we should go back to real-life issues.
Wilfried.
participants (3)
-
J Cousteau -
poty＠iiat.ru -
Wilfried Woeber, UniVie/ACOnet