Dear Gert,

 

Your speech is confusing and ambiguous. Cohesion and Coherence are fundamental in textual construction. Coherence is the logical relation of the ideas of a text that derives from its argument - a result of the knowledge of the message transmitter.

 

A contradictory and redundant text is an incoherent text. Your text resembles this phrase: "He is a vegetarian and likes a juicy steak."

 

That fine line between "freedom of speech" and "violating the freedom of others" is based on the same directives that dictate the laws: common sense and habits and customs of the time. I never scream "fire", I always complain with evidence.

 

But you're screaming "fire" where there is no fire. I wonder why?

 

> Nobody has the right to personally attack others - or force others to listen to his droning on, by filling their listening channels.

 

You are attacking me because I said:

"I may not agree to any of the words you say, but I will defend to the death the right of you to say them."

Or because I said that your colleagues, ISP owners, are criminals?

Do you have listening channels in your eyes? I suggest that you cover your eyes not to listen to my voice messages.

 

Freedom of information concerns the individual right to freely communicate facts and the diffuse right to be informed of them; Freedom of expression, in turn, is intended to protect the right to express ideas, opinions, judgments of value, in short, any manifestation of human thought. But both require *real events* as basis. Perhaps that is why US law, the European Convention on Human Rights (Article 10.1) and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (Article 19) treat the two freedoms together.

 

I've been attacked several times, as I am now, and no one says shit.

> This list is like a private club. Yes, anyone can state their opinion, but if they start to annoy the other patrons, the landlord is free to ask them to state their opinion elsewhere.