Hi Gilles I have just submit a proposal to the DB WG on the cleanup process. There was some discussion a long time ago on converting IRT object into ROLE objects, but that discussion was never brought to any conclusion. I don't propose to include that in this cleanup. cheers Denis Walker Independent Netizen On 07/05/2015 19:06, Gilles Massen wrote:
Hi,
On 5/5/2015 15:59 , denis walker wrote:
The first two steps are done, but the last one seems to have been overlooked. The idea of "abuse-c:" was to create one single place/way of documenting abuse contact details. So far all that has been achieved is to add a fourth way to document it. All the old ways ("abuse-mailbox:" in 5 object types, IRT and remarks) are still littered throughout the database.
I think it is time to schedule that cleanup. I'd like to have the "cleanup" defined and discussed before doing it. The 'remarks' are obviously not really useful, and the abuse-c seems to replace functionally the abuse-mailbox (except that I still miss a 'more specific' abuse-c). The IRT objects are different though, and have features that the abuse-c lacks. So unless the abuse-c is able to replace the IRT, I'd object to deleting those.
(to be specific: I'd hate to lose the signature and encryption fields - I think it was a mistake not to add those to the abuse-c from the start)
best, Gilles