Whoops, that was fun part my mind completely obsoleted and slipped out from the current understanding of the proposal. As I've stated about a month ago in one of original threads derived from message with the proposal, the intention will be shadowed out, the better the large bad actor is. AFAICS nobody have ever proposed clear 'intentional' distinction over entire set of threads. To add another remark to this, even trusted 'expert' parties could disagree on that subtle matter, making the punishing decision, whatever it would be, with false positives and false negatives all over the place. I'd suggest to remove any relations with behavior of human entities from the draft at least, as even technical part of the proposal seem to be very far from being objective.