> look at the headers of this email, check my hetzner.de IP number and
then do the same for other reporting systems...
OMG, you are using Hetzner.de as a sender! An ISP with a dirty history of
repression of press freedom and defense of spammers and arrogant political
psychopaths.
Using Hetzner's IP is a risk, for sure. Your IP is clean... NOW!
You're right. You are involved with criminal enterprise, but you are
pointing in the wrong direction.
BTW, your WordPress is outdated (under 4.7.5). Website outdated means "high
risk" and can be listed by mistake. ;)
About virtual or real honeynets, make contact and help them!
Marilson
Sent: Friday, May 26, 2017 1:57 AM
Subject: Re: [anti-abuse-wg] fake abuse lists
On
Fri, 26 May 2017 01:14:24 -0300
"Marilson" <marilson.mapa@gmail.com>
wrote:
> The SPFBL.net is not a criminal enterprise. It's just
another
> competitor of you and it's welcome considering the criminal
attitudes
> of companies like Spamcop and Netcraft.
>
Weird
that they would suddenly list me for abuse, whereas there has been no
abuse...
And, after checking, they are listing many honeynets, reporting
systems
and others, also...
look at the headers of this email, check
my hetzner.de IP number and
then do the same for other reporting
systems...
all listed.
coincidence?
No. - Criminal
Enterprise or criminals in their enterprise or some
other low life scummy
type behavior...
>
http://www.nic.br/videos/ver/gter-42-spfbl-aplicacao-p2p-para-prevencao-de-spam/
>
> The SPFBL.net aims to be a collaborative system to combat spam.
A
> cooperative system: users share alerts against spammers through
a
> reputation mechanism. I hope they succeed because the
Brazilian
> population is tired of being the victim of damn ISPs. But take
care,
> consider this with a grain of salt, after all they are...
Brazilians.
>
> Marilson
>
> From:
anti-abuse-wg-request@ripe.net
> Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2017 7:00
AM
> To: anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net
> Subject: anti-abuse-wg Digest,
Vol 66, Issue 8
>
> Send anti-abuse-wg mailing list submissions
to
> anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe
via the World Wide Web, visit
>
https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/anti-abuse-wg
> or, via email,
send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>
anti-abuse-wg-request@ripe.net
>
> You can reach the person
managing the list at
> anti-abuse-wg-owner@ripe.net
>
> When
replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re:
Contents of anti-abuse-wg digest..."
>
>
> Today's
Topics:
>
> 1. fake abuse lists (ox)
>
>
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Thu, 25 May 2017 07:20:58 +0200
> From:
ox <andre@ox.co.za>
> To: anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net
> Subject:
[anti-abuse-wg] fake abuse lists
> Message-ID:
<mailman.2.1495706402.1949.anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net>
> Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
>
> Hello,
>
> Can anyone
share any experiences with: http://spfbl.net/en/dnsbl/
>
> It
seems that they list servers that are used to file complaints with
>
Spamcop and other blacklists - as "spam" servers...
>
> They do not
de-list these servers, ever, and it seems like a criminal
> enterprise or
services designed to 'punish' or list complainants or
> victims?
>
> there are of course other 'fake' / non maintained and
worthless
> blacklists, like abuse-att.net etc etc. but these generally
do not go
> out of their way to punish victims...
>
> What is
the best way to fight criminal enterprises that enter data
> streams and
'hide' / market etc as ethical service providers?
>
>
Andre
>
>
>
> End of anti-abuse-wg Digest, Vol 66,
Issue 8
>
********************************************