Re: [anti-abuse-wg] audit proposals

Entirely depends on the audit's conclusions. 1. Shell company in romania or the ukraine - "the documents say it is a registered company". Stop. 2. Hosting snowshoe spam or malware or whatever. "the justification just says "hosting". stop" :) On Tuesday, June 25, 2013, Frank Gadegast wrote:

Ronald F. Guilmette wrote:

Sounds like a good start ... but I doubt if this should be the job of the anti-abuse-wg or its chair.

I would rather prever, if there would be somebody at the RIPE NCC having this job, and setting up another wg maillinglist (like abuse-audit@ripe.net) ...

I personally do not like to be flodded with discussions about specific networks, that might or might not be audited again ...

If this gets changed, Im +1

-- --srs (iPad)