24 Nov
2011
24 Nov
'11
2:17 p.m.
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 10:46:38AM +0100, Frank Gadegast wrote: hi,
At least an abuse-c is much nicer to parse for the normal people than an IRT object, because it will appear in the normal whois output for any IP asked for.
This is also true for the IRT object. Parsing is as easy as parsing any other object.
- how or who will test, if an abuce-c is correct ? - will the whois state, who to contact (or wich URL to visit), if an abuse-c isnt reachable or correct ? - what is happening, if the abuce-c isnt correct ?
Thanks for bringing up these questions. Trusted Introducer solved all of these some time ago. Cheers, Adrian