All, This conversation is not in any way useful to the community at this point and it is definitely not in the spirit of the Code of Conduct. The request was made in regards to a contact. The initial discussion was about whether Hetzner's processes were valid or not, that is fine. However we've gone well past that and I would ask both of you to please step away from the conversation. This is not a question of who said what or the relative merits of same, it's a case of a thread that should please cease. And I would caution everyone on the list to please, as always, consider their responses and whether they *need* to respond to any post here. And if you do need to respond, which you may well, that's great, but if you do, do so in a respectful manner. Thank you, Brian Co-Chair, RIPE AA-WG Brian Nisbet Service Operations Manager HEAnet CLG, Ireland's National Education and Research Network 1st Floor, 5 George's Dock, IFSC, Dublin D01 X8N7, Ireland +35316609040 brian.nisbet@heanet.ie www.heanet.ie Registered in Ireland, No. 275301. CRA No. 20036270
-----Original Message----- From: anti-abuse-wg <anti-abuse-wg-bounces@ripe.net> On Behalf Of ac Sent: Thursday 25 April 2019 11:08 To: anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net Subject: Re: [anti-abuse-wg] AS24940 Hetzner -- non-role contact wanted
On Thu, 25 Apr 2019 02:42:35 -0700 "Ronald F. Guilmette" <rfg@tristatelogic.com> wrote:
I have just been reviewing the RIPE Code of Conduct for mailing lists, and specifically these sections:
https://www.ripe.net/participate/mail/ripe-mailing-list-ripe-forum-cod e-of-conduct
RIPE community members should not spam mailing lists, post others' personal information, register multiple accounts to avoid moderation or mislead participants, impersonate others, or make threats. Overt marketing or promotional activities are discouraged.
Chairs are responsible for facilitating and moderating the RIPE community's discussions. At times they may direct an individual to cease a certain type of behaviour. Chairs have the authority to moderate or ban disruptive community members if they decide this is necessary.
I'd just like to ask you if you are in agreement with the above quoted
Yes, I am in complete agreement with the above.
That said, you, on the other hand are clearly not.
Whether I am wearing underwear or not hardly has anything to do with this abuse list and your discussing my underwear is also hardly proper.
And, you, requesting a non-role contact at Hetzner, is clearly an indication of the bully you are.
That you are also an ignorant bully is now common cause.
Andre