On 19.04.12 17:37, Adrian wrote:
On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 03:04:32PM +0200, Tobias Knecht wrote:
Tobias,
I think we should wait and see how the IRT Object will be handled after this proposal is in place and may be there can be a decision about keeping the IRT Object in place or not, or maybe even changing it to it's origin idea.
Are the folks using IRT Objects at a larger scale (e.G. TI) included in this discussion?
They are not directly included by us into the discussion, but they are of course welcome to take part in this discussion. But please keep in mind that 2011-06 is not about the IRT Object. The things I mentioned can and will be part of another discussion, maybe another proposal. And the renaming of the mnt-irt into irt-c is not essential for this proposal. I was just mentioning it, because this was talked about in the Task Force and could show up in the RIPE NCC implementation suggestion. Thanks, Tobias