On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 01:16:47PM -0700, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote:
More to the point however, although RIPE NCC may indeed wish, as a matter of policy, to refrain from disclosing "non-public information", any such policy is obviously, demonstratably, and utterly irrelevant to the request I have made.
Your request is off-topic for this WG. The NCC is content-agnostic and "internet abuse" is not a reason to terminate a contract and close a LIR. It also concerns a contractual issue between the RIPE NCC and the member(s) in question. This is not the business of the RIPE community or any WG (other than, perhaps, ncc-services) The NCC has, in the spirit of helpfulness, shown you some courtesy in providing certain information - a courtesy that, given your continued attempts to paint it as either hapless idiots or a den of thieves, you don't deserve. Even the request for numbers of closures as well as the answer given were strictly-speaking off-topic for this WG. rgds, Sascha Luck