Ronald F. Guilmette wrote: [...]
(I believe that I saw it asserted here earlier that, even as of this late date, there is no general agreement, within this group or within the RIPE membership as a whole as to what things might or do constitute "abuse of the Internet". If that is correct, then offhand I would have to say that arriving at some common understanding of that term could be, would be, and should be the first order of business for this group, above all else. I mean what's the point of having an "anti abuse" group if nobody even knows for sure what "abuse" is?)
I think you just made the case for dissolving the AAWG, :-) under *your* assumption that the Community on the Internet will be able to come up with a *unified definition* and *central management* of "abuse of the Internet". Wilfried.