> I am not a criminal and not a criminal company. So,
I do
> not have criminal competitors.
Although this phrase is beyond my capacity for
understanding, I think I should greet you for not fearing unfair
competition.
> Just on a side note, my opinion is that you calling
Martin Hetzner a
> Nazi (and a sociopath) is not acceptable
behavior.
I'll explain to you what is not acceptable
behavior:
1- It is you being customer of a provider owner
with a professional life history worthy of an arrogant sociopath with the
attitudes of a Nazi despot - reread the curriculum I related.
2- It is you acting like some Afrikaners who
defended the principles of the National Socialist Party - read Nazism - that
gave support to the maintenance of apartheid in your homeland. Heil
Hetzner!
3- It is an ISP owner refusing to suspend a
reported customer numerous times, for 18 months, with evidence of the practice
of crime.
4- It is an ISP owner to allow a victim of his
client to spend 18 months denouncing the same scam, the same
scammer.
> It is hate speech in
itself and disrespectful to civil society.
A hate speech: If I
lived in Germany I would have sued this tramp. From where I am I can only insult
and report him to the world.
Disrespect to civil society are his relationships
with sociopath despots like Putin, are his attacks on freedom of the press, are
his pursuits those who fight spammers and give support for reported
criminals.
Disrespect to civil society it is to defend and
hire the services of people who should be arrested.
Heil Coetzee!
Marilson
Sent: Sunday, May 28, 2017 2:21 AM
Subject: Re: [anti-abuse-wg] fake abuse lists