Dan Luedtke wrote, On 2012-01-18 17:19:
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 12:27 PM, U.Mutlu<security@mutluit.com> wrote:
I even would like to have several (2 or 3) abuse contact email addresses as there are several kinds of abuses (spam with ads, spam with criminal intent, hacking attempts, flood attacks/(D)DoS, portscans, service attacks, copyright infringement, impersonation, sockpuppetry, insult/discrimination, ...),
I like this kind of information to be embedded in the protocol/format used for reporting. There are already standards being worked on, or even used. This should not be part of the RIPE database itself.
I guess you mean ARF/MARF (RFC 5965; http://www.ietf.org/dyn/wg/charter/marf-charter); yes, makes sense to handle the details therein. Of course ARF/MARF as well depends on a abuse contact, so we need a mandatory standard to follow, and therefore the current proposal of the wg should be ratified as soon as possible.