On Wed, 26 Jun 2013 20:01:26 +0530 Suresh Ramasubramanian <ops.lists@gmail.com> wrote:
Consider, if you will, a domain that has absolutely no "content", but is the command and control for a fast flux botnet. Which has been the case with both the latvian as well as austrian cctld cases.
We have many domains that are ONLY used for email, some for DNS, etc. etc. (one client uses his domain just for MUD) -- So "content" should not even be mentioned / discussed... but there are so many valid points and if you are open/unbiased it is very hard to decide a firm opinion. For myself: we all become desperate as the fight against spam/abuse is sometimes a very difficult one as things are not always white and black but more than 50 shades of grey :)