Hi, On Sat, May 18, 2019 at 10:38:46AM +0200, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via anti-abuse-wg wrote:
I have an idea.
I will set up a service where everyone can have an e-mail address which will totally follow everything you propose as validation mechanism - like, click on tokes, report back in 10 minutes (even in the middle of the night), etc. - LIRs that want to be spared this annoyance can just pay me 50 EUR/month, and I'll handle all these chores for them.
So, this would totally fulfill your proposed policy, and not help in any bit with *abuse handling*.
That automated system will be against the policy. I've already worded it out in such way that is not possible this type of "work-around the policy", at least it was my original intent to avoid it. If I've broken something across more than 20 versions that I edited internally since started, I will make sure to fix it in the next version.
Who said that this is automated? If enough LIRs give me 50 EUR/month, I can hire a few students who will sit there all day waiting for confirmation requests and dutifully do (as humans) what they are expected to do. You do not seem to be willing to listen: what you propose is sheer and uncalled-for extra annoyance for the vast majority of LIRs, and will do *nothing* to improve abuse handling. All it will do is ensure that someone wastes a few minutes of human lifetime on your challenge. And *that* can be nicely outsourced. Gert Doering -- NetMaster -- have you enabled IPv6 on something today...? SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard, Michael Emmer Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279