Leo Vegoda wrote:
Hi Frank,
Hi Leo,
On Apr 27, 2013, at 3:17 am, Frank Gadegast<ripe-anti-spam-wg@powerweb.de> wrote:
[…]
I like to raise questions about what kind of responsibilities an abuse contact should have and look forward for comments or experiences you have with other providers.
Can you please define what you mean by responsibilities? Are you referring to some kind of contractually enforced minimum requirements or are you thinking of something closer to industry best practices?
Actually both and more :o) Soon all netblocks will have an abuse address, but now its time to ask whats happening after everybody could get abuse reports. What do ISPs on this list do with abuse reports they receive ? What is their experience with other ISPs not on this list when they are reporting abuse to those ? What actions are covered by current RIPE regulations (I guess simply none, just asking this to be sure) ? Are there any regulations in other countries already covering any kind of abuse action ? Is there any kind of discussion between RIPE and legal entities in specific countries or the industry to force any kind of abuse action ? What do all of you LIKE as regulations (addresses need to be valid, addresses should be able to receive mail (no mailbox full errors aso)) ? Should it be the NCCs job to deal with complaints about not working abuse addresses ? An example: we already collect a list of abuse ignorant ISPs and their abuse addresses, simply because its not worth delivering abuse reports to addresses that always fail ... Kind regards, Frank
Thanks,
Leo
-- Mit freundlichen Gruessen, -- PHADE Software - PowerWeb http://www.powerweb.de Inh. Dipl.-Inform. Frank Gadegast mailto:frank@powerweb.de Schinkelstrasse 17 fon: +49 33200 52920 14558 Nuthetal OT Rehbruecke, Germany fax: +49 33200 52921 ======================================================================