20 Jun
2013
20 Jun
'13
3:16 p.m.
Sascha Luck wrote the following on 20/06/2013 14:10:
Hi Brian,
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 01:08:03PM +0100, Brian Nisbet wrote:
The second may be that while these companies may be legitimate businesses the NCC is aware of the local law and says, "Ah, no, we know, for a fact, that you are mandated to use these resources for network abuse, therefore your application is invalid."
Hmmm. That raises an interesting question: What *does* the NCC consider "network abuse" and grounds to deny an, otherwise legitimate, request? I was not aware that the RAs even have this option...
Please note the word "may". We're still talking hypotheticals and I doubt this would be the decision of just one IPRA. I would also not presume to speak for the NCC. Brian