On 18 May 2019, at 9:38, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via anti-abuse-wg wrote:
El 18/5/19 10:35, "Gert Doering" <gert@space.net> escribió:
I have an idea.
I will set up a service where everyone can have an e-mail address which will totally follow everything you propose as validation mechanism - like, click on tokes, report back in 10 minutes (even in the middle of the night), etc. - LIRs that want to be spared this annoyance can just pay me 50 EUR/month, and I'll handle all these chores for them.
So, this would totally fulfill your proposed policy, and not help in any bit with *abuse handling*.
That automated system will be against the policy. I've already worded it out in such way that is not possible this type of "work-around the policy", at least it was my original intent to avoid it.
I wonder how words can make anything impossible. I also wonder how to implement a dependable Turing Test for distinguishing between what Gert suggests ( a kind of "Mechanical Turk") and a real human. Just saying. Niall