>Why on earth is this exchange being Cced to this group?
Michele given your behavior in anti-abuse-wg, I was already waiting your comment and knew exactly what would you say. After all, Blacknight is a domain register and hosting company. I will not wish you my condolences because I do not know how your company reacts to reports of abuse.
>If you have an issue with company X and want to discuss it – fine.
I did not bring to this group a particular problem with a particular company. I always try into my complaints to cover a spectrum of the problem with respect to the activities of e-mail marketing as a whole. And that's relevant to the group.
In this particular case, that you has reacted promptly and as expected, I used my complaint to CloudFlare to discuss the basic and universal foundation of the criminal behavior of ISPs and Registrars. CloudFlare had the right to say - and we with this? Not you! If the data reported and the accusations made are not relevant to the group, close the group because you would be a joke.
I understand that if ISPs and Registrars act in accordance with their privacy policies and anti-spam, 90% would be closed and tens of thousands of people would be unemployed. But since when it gives them the right to protect criminals and spammers or to refuse to suspend a scammer as has happened to me?
So let's decriminalize the smuggling of weapons, sex slaves, drugs, money laundering, pedophilia, etc., etc., because it will create jobs and money back to the market.
Anyway Michele, you're trying to turn the main reason of the existence of anti-abuse in a particular issue in order not to discuss an anti-social behavior that guarantees your job, this might be the reason for your behavior? If not excuse me.
I certainly did not bring a particular problem to the group. You're trying to turn it into a particular problem. Please explain why you're doing it.
Thanks
Marilson
From:Michele Neylon - Blacknight
“Spam now accounts for 90.4 percent of all e-mail, according to a report released Monday from security vendor Symantec. This means that 1 out of every 1.1 e-mails is junk. The report also notes that spam shot up 5.1 percent just from April to May.”
http://www.cnet.com/news/report-spam-now-90-percent-of-all-e-mail/
These numbers explain, beyond any doubt because many ISPs and Registrars are accomplices of scammers and spammers. Their privacy policies and anti-spam are the joke of the twenty-first century and nothing is more hypocritical.
So Justin, as I said, you have no crystal ball, but I sent you evidence that your client is an accomplice of a scammer, what will you do? Will do as do the greedy sociopaths of Softlayer-IBM, Enzu, Namecheap, eNom, UOL, Lomadee-Experian, m-zone.cz, studenka.cz, Aruba, Locaweb, Microsoft, etc?
Bye
Marilson
Hello marilson.mapa@gmail.com,
Your report (#594134) has been been replied to. Note -- When responding please make sure to keep #594134 in the subject line.
|
Thank you for your report.
To expedite processing of your abuse report, please submit your abuse report through CloudFlare's abuse reporting web form at:
https://www.cloudflare.com/abuse/
Please be aware CloudFlare offers network service solutions, including a reverse proxy, pass-through security service and a content distribution network (CDN).
Because CloudFlare is a reverse proxy, our IP addresses appear in whois and DNS records for websites using our services. CloudFlare is not a hosting provider, and we do not have access to our customer's content.
Regards,
CloudFlare Trust and Safety